Manasses jako nawrócony król – poszukiwanieprzyczyn zmiany .punktu widzenia autora 2Krn 33,1-20
Dariusz Kucharek
Papieski Wydział Teologiczny w Warszawie, Collegium Joanneum (Polska)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-5821
Abstrakt
The Chronicler adds in his work (2Chr 33:1-20) the description of the King’s Manasseh conversion what causes that he has the different point of view than the author of the Second Kings 21:1-18 where it hasn’t been mentioned about Manasseh’s metanoia. The Deuteronomist emphasizes the sinfulness of the king and his responsibility for the fall and captivity of Judah. The reason of the different description and valuation of the Manasseh’s life may be various sources used by the authors during the composition of the pericopes or the different theological aims that inspired the creation of stories. On the base of the conducted analyses it needs to be said that it is impossible to find the sources which could be the material used by the Chronicler. Thus the differences in the biblical traditions should be argued by the other context and the Chronicler’s theological assumptions in the light of which the figure of King Manasseh is shown.
Słowa kluczowe:
Manasses, 2Krn 33,1-20, 2Krl 21,1-18, krytyka źródeł, niewola babilońskaBibliografia
Abadie, P. (2003). From the Impious Manasseh (2Kings 21) to the Covert Manasseh (2Chronicles 33): Theological Rewriting by the Chronicler. W: M. Graham, S. Mckenzie (red.), The Chronicles as Theologian (s. 62–89). London: T. & T. Clark.
Google Scholar
Albertz, R, (2009). Israele in Esilio. Brescia: Paideia.
Google Scholar
Alexander, P. (1992). Targum, Targumim. W: D. N. Freedman (red.), Anchor Bible Dictionary (s. 320–321). New York: Doubleday.
Google Scholar
Berrin, S. (2004). The Pesher Nahum Scroll from Qumran. An Exegetical Study of 4Q169. Boston: Brill.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047404248
Google Scholar
Borger, R. (1956). Die Inschriften Asarhaddons Königs von Assyrien. Graz: Im Selbstverlage des Herausgebers.
Google Scholar
Bright, J. (2000). A History of Israel. Atlanta: Westminster John Knox Press. Charlesworth, J. (1983). The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. T. 2. New York–London–Toronto–Sydney–Auckland: Dubleday & Company.
Google Scholar
Charlesworth, J. (1985). “2 Baruch”, The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. T. I: Apocalyptic Literature and Testaments. New York: Dubleday & Company.
Google Scholar
Cogan, M. (1974). Imperialism and Religion. Assyria, Judah and Israel in the Eighth and Seventh Centuries B.C.E. Montana: Society of Biblical Literature.
Google Scholar
Cogan, M., Tadmor, H. (2001). II Kings. A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New York–London–Toronto–Sydney–Aukland: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Craige, P., Kelley, P., Drinkard, J. (1991). Jeremiah 1–25. Dallas: Thomas Nelson.
Google Scholar
Curtis, E., Madsen, A. (1910). A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Books of Chronicles. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Google Scholar
Davila, J. (2007). Is the Prayer of Manasseh a Jewish work? Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism (119), 75–85.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004158566.i-339.26
Google Scholar
De Wette, W. (1806). Kritischer Versuch über die Glaubwürdigkeit der Bücher der Chronik: mit Hinsicht auf die Geschichte der Mosaischen Bücher und Gesetzgebung. Beiträge zur Einleitung in das Alte Testament 1, 159–175.
Google Scholar
Dillard, R. (1987). 2 Chronicles. Waco: Thomas Nelson.
Google Scholar
Ehrlich, E. (1965). Der Aufenthalt des Königs Manasse in Babylon. Theologische Zeitschrift (21), 281–286.
Google Scholar
Gane, R. (1997). Role of Assyria in Ancient Near East During the Reign of Manasseh. Andrews University Seminary Studies 37 (1-2), 21–32.
Google Scholar
Graham, M., Mckenzie, S. (1999) The Chronicler as Author. Studies In Text and Texture. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Guillemette, P., Brisebois, M. (1990). Introduzione ai Metodi Storico-Critici. Roma: Borla.
Google Scholar
Himbaza, I. (2006). Le Roi Manassé. Héritage et Conflit du pardon. Genéve: Labor et Fides.
Google Scholar
Japhet, S. (1993). I&II Chronicles. A Commentary. London: Westminster John Knox Press.
Google Scholar
Johnstone, W. (1997). 1 and 2 Chronicles. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Kelly, B. (1996). Retribution and Eschatology in Chronicles. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Kelly, B. (2002). Manasseh in the Books of Kings and Chronicles (2 Kings 21:1-18; 2 Chron 33:1-20). W: V. P. Long, D. W. Baker, G. J. Wenham (red.), Windows into Old Testament History: Evidence, Argument, and the Crisis of “Biblical Israel” (s. 131–146). Grand Rapids: W.B. Eerdmans.
Google Scholar
Mcivor, J. (1994). The Targum of Chronicles. Translated, with Introduction, Apparatus and Notes. Edinburgh: Liturgical Press.
Google Scholar
Montgomery, J., Gehman, H. (1967). A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Kings. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
Google Scholar
Noth, M. (1943). Überlieferungsgeschichtliech Studien: Die sammelnden Und bearbeitenden Geschichtswerke im Alten Testament. Halle: Niemeyer.
Google Scholar
Noth, M. (1987). The Chronicler’s History. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Pritchard, J. (1995). Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Rainey, A. (1997). The Chronicler and His Sources-Historical and Geographical. W: K-G. Houglund, S. L. Mckenzie (red.), The Chronicler as Historian (s. 376–405). Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Rendtorff, R. (2003). Teologia dell’Antico Testamento. Torino: Claudiana.
Google Scholar
Rendtorff, R. (2006). Teologia dell’Antico Testamento. Torino: Claudiana.
Google Scholar
Römer, T. (2007). Dal Deuteronomio ai Libr idei Re. Introduzione storica, letteraria e sociologica. Torino: Claudiana.
Google Scholar
Schniedewind, W. (1996). A Qumran Fragment of the Ancient Prayer of Manasseh? Zeitschritf für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft (108), 105–107.
Google Scholar
Schuller, E. (1992). 4Q380 And 4Q381: Non-Canonical Psalms From Qumran. W: D. Dimant, U. Rappaport (red.), The Dead Sea Scrolls. Forty Years of Research (s. 90–99). Leiden-New York-Köln-Jerusalem: Brill.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004350113_010
Google Scholar
Smelik, K. (1992). Converting the Past. Studies in Ancient Israelite and Moabite Historiography. Leiden: Brill.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004497627
Google Scholar
Sokoloff, M. (2002). A Dictionary of Jewish Palestinian Aramaic of the Byzantine Period. Ramat-Gam: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Stavrakopoulou, F. (2004). King Manasseh and Child Sacrifice. Biblical Distortions of Historical Realities. Berlin–New York: Walter de Gruyter.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110899641
Google Scholar
Suski, A. (2000). Modlitwa Manassesa. W: R. Rubinkiewicz (red.), Apokryfy Starego Testamentu (s. 129–130). Wyd. 2. Warszawa: Vocatio.
Google Scholar
Szymik, S. (2013). Współczesne Modele Egzegezy Biblijnej. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
Google Scholar
Tov, E. (1986). The Orthography and Language of the Hebrew Scrolls found at Qumran and Origin of These Scrolls. Textus (13), 31–57.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2589255X-01301003
Google Scholar
Von Rad, G. (1986). Teologia Starego Testamentu. Warszawa: Instytut Wydawniczy Pax.
Google Scholar
Wellhausen, J. (1878) Prolegomena to the History of Israel. Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black.
Google Scholar
WoźniaK, J. (2000). Apokalipsa Barucha Syryjska. Księga Objawienia Barucha, Syna Neriji przełożona z języka greckiego na syryjski. W: R. Rubinkiewicz (red.), Apokryfy Starego Testamentu (s. 407–442). Wyd. 2. Warszawa: Vocatio.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Dariusz KucharekPapieski Wydział Teologiczny w Warszawie, Collegium Joanneum Polska
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-5821
Ks. dr Dariusz KUCHAREK – kapłan Diecezji Drohiczyńskiej, ojciec duchowny i wykładowca Pisma Świętego w Wyższym Seminarium Duchownym w Drohiczynie oraz wykładowca na Papieskim Wydziale Teologicznym w Warszawie, z wykształcenia biblista, z zamiłowania również.
Statystyki
Abstract views: 244PDF downloads: 77
Licencja
Czasopismo jest bezpłatne i udostępniane na zasadach otwartego dostępu (w formacie pdf na stronie internetowej). Od autorów artykułów nie są pobierane żadne opłaty. „Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne” ukazują się na licencji według standardów Creative Commons: CC BY-ND 4.0 (Uznanie autorstwa - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe) i nie prowadzą skonkretyzowanej polityki dotyczącej danych badawczych. Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie.