Luke’s Divine Call of Jesus. Part Two

Robert Lee Williams

rwilliams@bhcarroll.edu
B.H. Carroll Theological Seminary, Irving TX, USA (United States)
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2742-8898

Abstract

This study is being published in two parts, the first extending through four occasions of divine guidance and the Travel Narrative in the previous issue, and this part beginning with the fifth and final instance of guidance. The abstract of the study as a whole is as follows. Luke represents Jesus’ death as the martyrdom of a prophet. M. Dibelius noted this in 1919. C.H. Talbert added in 1982 that Jesus’ death “is not an atoning sacrifice.” Such an assessment of Jesus and his death, for the “Christ” who “atones for sins,” is anemic to some scholars. F. Bovon prefers to say, “[T]he attitude of the people... testifies not only to the exemplary character but also to the redemptive nature of the passion.” The question is thus posed: Was Jesus’ passion in Luke “redemptive”? The answer is found in Luke’s divine call of Jesus. Luke portrays Jesus as being progressively informed of God’s plans for him on five occasions, each evidently following a time of prayer. The first, after his baptism (3:21b-22), reveals to him divine approval in royal and servant terminology. Next, after a night of prayer (6:12), he selects twelve apostles and proclaims new teaching in the “Sermon on the Plain.” Then come two times of prayer (9:18, 29), the first prior to and the second on the occasion of his visible transformation on a mountain, the “Transfiguration,” regarding Jesus’ prophetic role and his coming suffering. Finally, after declaring at his last meal the beginning of a new covenant, but without reference to sacrifice for sins, he prays for guidance one last time on the Mount of Olives (22:41-44), preparing for anticipated suffering and vindication. We conclude that Jesus’ death, in Luke’s Gospel, is the martyrdom of a prophet that does not atone for sins but does seal a new covenant (22:20).


Keywords:

Luke, Gospel of Luke, Jesus, Isaianic servant of Yahweh, prophet, Christ, martyrdom, new covenant

Barbour, R.S. (1969-70). Gethsemane in the Passion Narrative. New Testament Studies, 16, pp. 231-51.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500012509   Google Scholar

Bauer, W. (1957). A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and other Early Christian Literature (2nd ed.; W.F. Arndt, F.W. Gingrich, and F.W. Danker, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  Google Scholar

Blass, F., and Debrunner, A. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (R. Funk, Rev. and Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  Google Scholar

Blinzler, J. (1969). Der Prozess Jesu (Rev. ed., Vol. 4). Regensburg: F. Pustet.
  Google Scholar

Bock, D.L. (2012). A Theology of Luke and Acts. God’s Promised Program, Realized for All Nations. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
  Google Scholar

Bornhäuser, K.B. (1958). The Death and Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Bangalore: C.L.S. Press.
  Google Scholar

Bovon, F. (1973). Le salut dans les écrits de Luc: Essai. Revue de théologie et de philosophie, 23 (4), pp. 296-307.
  Google Scholar

Bovon, F. (2012a). Luke 2. A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 9:51-19:27. (D.S. Deer, Trans.). Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress.
  Google Scholar

Bovon, F. (2012b). Luke 3. A Commentary on the Gospel of Luke 19:28-24:53. (J.S. Crouch, Trans.). Hermeneia Minneapolis: Fortress.
  Google Scholar

Brawley, R.L. (2016). Luke. In Aymer, M., Kittredge, C.B., Sάnchez, D.A. (Eds.), The Gospels and Acts. Fortress Commentary on the Bible Study Edition. Minneapolis: Fortress.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1b3t6xx.13   Google Scholar

Brun, L. (1933). Engel und Blutschweiss Lc. 22, 43-44. Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche, 32, pp. 265-76.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zntw.1933.32.3.265   Google Scholar

Catchpole, D. (1971a). The Answer of Jesus to Caiaphas (Matt. xxvi.64). New Testament Studies, 17, pp. 213-26.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688500015605   Google Scholar

Catchpole, D. (1971b). The Trial of Jesus. A Study in the Gospels and Jewish Historiography from 1770 to the Present Day. Leiden: Brill.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004508965   Google Scholar

Dibelius, M. (1965). From Tradition to Gospel. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  Google Scholar

Dinkler, M.B. (2023). Luke: Introduction. In McKenzie, S.L., De Troyer, K, Spencer, F.S., (Eds.), The SBL Study Bible: New Revised Standard Version Updated Version (pp. 1827-32). HarperCollins.
  Google Scholar

Du Plessis, I.J. (1994). The Saving Significance of Jesus and His Death on the Cross in Luke’s Gospel – Focusing on Luke 22:19b-20. Neotestamentica 28, pp. 523-40.
  Google Scholar

Dussaut, L. (1987). Le triptyque, des apparitions en Luc 24 (analyse structurelle). Revue Biblique 94, pp. 161-213.
  Google Scholar

Ellis, E.E. (1966). The Gospel of Luke. New Century Bible. New York: Nelson.
  Google Scholar

Green, J.B. (1995). The Theology of the Gospel of Luke. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166683   Google Scholar

Green, J.B. (1997). The Gospel of Luke. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/bci-000t   Google Scholar

Grundmann, W. (1966). Das Evangelium nach Lukas. Theologischer Handkommentar zum Neuen Testament (Vol. 3). Berlin: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt.
  Google Scholar

Jeremias, J. (1967). παῖς θεοῦ. In G. Friedrich (Ed.), Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (G. Bromiley, Trans., Vol. 5, pp. 654-714). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
  Google Scholar

Jeremias, J. (1972). The Parables of Jesus (2nd ed.; S.H. Hooke, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  Google Scholar

Junod, É. (1982). Polymorphie du Dieu Sauveur. In J. Ries (Ed.), Gnosticism et monde hellénstique. Publications de l’Institut orientaliste de Louvain 27. Louvain-La-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain, pp. 38-46.
  Google Scholar

Kimbell, J. (2012). Jesus’ Death in Luke-Acts: The New Covenant Sacrifice. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology 16.3, pp. 28-48.
  Google Scholar

Liefeld, W.L. (1984). Luke. In F.E. Gaebelein, J.D. Douglas (Eds.), The Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Vol. 8, pp. 797-1059). Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
  Google Scholar

Marshall, I.H. (1978). Commentary on Luke. NIGTC. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
  Google Scholar

Marshall, I.H. (1988). Luke. Historian Theologian, 3rd ed. Downers Grove: IVP.
  Google Scholar

Monloubou, L. (1976). La prière selon saint Luc. recherche d’une structure. Lectio Divina 89. Paris: Cerf.
  Google Scholar

Moo, D.J. (1983). The Old Testament in the Gospel Passion Narratives. Sheffield: Almond.
  Google Scholar

Morgenthaler, R. (1948). Die Lukanische Geschichtsschreibung als Zeugnis. Zürich: Zwingli Verlag.
  Google Scholar

Schnackenburg, R. (1959). Die Erwartung des ‘Propheten’ nach dem Neuen Testament und den Qumran-Texten. Studia Evangelica I. Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur, (Vol. 73, pp. 622-39). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
  Google Scholar

Schrenk, G. (1964). εὐδοκέω, εὐδοκία. In G. Kittel (Ed.), Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (G. Bromiley, Trans., Vol. 2, pp. 738-51). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
  Google Scholar

Soards, M.L. (1985). The Silence of Jesus before Herod: An Interpretive Suggestion. Australian Biblical Review 33, pp. 41-45.
  Google Scholar

Strauss, M.L. (1995). The Davidic Messiah in Luke-Acts: The Promise and Its Fulfillment in Lukan Christology, Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 110. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic.
  Google Scholar

Talbert, C.H. (1982). Reading Luke. A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel. New York: Crossroad.
  Google Scholar

Talbert, C.H. (2002). Reading Luke. A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Third Gospel. Rev. ed. Macon: Smyth Helwys.
  Google Scholar

Trites, A.A. (1977). The New Testament Concept of Witness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520471   Google Scholar

Trompf, G.W. (1979). The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought: From Antiquity to the Reformation. Berkeley: University of California.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520312401   Google Scholar

Vermes, G. (1981). Jesus the Jew. A Historian’s Reading of the Gospels. Minneapolis: Fortress.
  Google Scholar

Williams, R.L. (2024). Spectral Lives by Luke and Philostratus. Journeying of Holy Men. Lanham: Lexington.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781793651082   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2024-12-31

Cited by

Williams, R. L. (2024). Luke’s Divine Call of Jesus. Part Two. Warsaw Theological Studies, 37(2), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.30439/WST.2024.2.12

Authors

Robert Lee Williams 
rwilliams@bhcarroll.edu
B.H. Carroll Theological Seminary, Irving TX, USA United States
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2742-8898

Robert Lee Williams is currently a distinguished fellow at B.H. Carroll Theological Seminary (6500 North Belt Line Road, Irving TX 75063, USA), advising doctoral work. His most recent book, related to this article, is *Spectral Lives by Luke and Philostratus: Journeying of Holy Men* (Lanham: Lexington, 2024). He earned his PhD from the University of Chicago in 1983.



Statistics

Abstract views: 23
PDF downloads: 10


License

Copyright (c) 2024 Robert Lee Williams

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The journal is available free-of-charge and according to the Open Access regulations (as a PDF file on the website). The authors do not incur any costs related to publication. The journal is published in accordance with the Creative Commons license standard:  CC BY-ND 4.0 (Attribution – NoDerivatives 4.0 International)  and does not follow a concrete policy of conducting research. By submitting the article, the author gives the consent to such a form of sharing the text. The authors of the published articles retain their copyrights.