What anthropology for bioethics?
Szczepan Kaleciak
szczepankaleciak@pm.meThe Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-5909
Abstract
The pluralism of approaches in bioethics is a consequence of the different anthropological conceptions represented by the various ethical systems. The present study examines the different conceptions of understanding of human beings in the main contemporary bioethical theories, such as those of Beauchamp, Singer, Engelhardt and Warren, and assesses their adequacy. Personalism is then presented as a counter-proposal, emphasising that medical, psychological and juridical knowledge is insufficient for the purpose of making moral judgements. Finally, the question of the illumination of these anthropologies by the Revelation is posed.Keywords:
personalism, principlism, ethical anthropology, personalist anthropology, human dignityReferences
Catéchisme de l’Église Catholique. (2012) Desclée-Mame.
Google Scholar
Choromański, A. (2015). The human person as the “relational being” – Anthropological fundations of ecclesiology of the Second Vatican Council. Studia Theologia Dogmatica, 1, 58–87.
Google Scholar
Clouser, D. K., Gert, B. (1990). A Critique of Principlism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 15(2), 219–236.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/15.2.219
Google Scholar
Concile Vatican II (1965). Gaudium et Spes.
Google Scholar
Congrégation pour la doctrine de la foi. (1974). Déclaration Questio de abortu sur l’avortement provoqué.
Google Scholar
Conseil pontifical pour la pastorale des services de la santé. (1995). Charte des personnel de la santé.
Google Scholar
Engelhardt, T. H. (1996). The foundations of bioethics. Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195057362.001.0001
Google Scholar
Francois. (2020). Fratelli tutti, AAS 112 (11), 969-1074.
Google Scholar
Garcia, J. L. A. (2020). Virtues and Principles in Biomedical Ethics. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 45(4-5), 471–503.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa013
Google Scholar
Jean XXIII. (1961). Mater et Magistra. AAS 53, 401-464.
Google Scholar
Jean-Paul II. (1979). Redemptor hominis, AAS 71, 259-324.
Google Scholar
Jean-Paul II. (1985). Lettre apostolique à tous les jeunes du monde à l’occasion de l’année internationale de la junesse, AAS 77, 579-628
Google Scholar
Jean-Paul II. (1991). Centessimus annus, AAS 83, 793-867.
Google Scholar
Jean-Paul II. (1994). Tertio Millennio Adveniente, AAS 87, 5-41.
Google Scholar
Jean-Paul II. (1995). Evangelium vitae, AAS 87, 401-522.
Google Scholar
Kieniewicz, P. (2011). Anthropological Argument in Bioethics. Teologia i Moralność, 10, 25–40.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/tim.2011.10.2.2
Google Scholar
Moreland, J. P., Mitchell, J. (1995). Is the Human Person a Substance or a Property-thing? Ethics & Medicine, 11(3), 50–55.
Google Scholar
Pellegrino, E. D. (2000). Bioethics at Century’s Turn: Can Normative Ethics Be Retrieved? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25(6), 655–676.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/jmep.25.6.655.6133
Google Scholar
Pie XII. (1951). Discorso di sua santita Pio pp. XII alle partecipanti al congresso della unione cattolica italiana ostetriche. Pozyskano z: https://www.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/it/speeches/1951/documents/hf_p-xii_spe_19511029_ostetriche.html
Google Scholar
Richardson, H. S. (2000). Specifying, Balancing, and Interpreting Bioethical Principles. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 25(3), 285–307.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1076/0360-5310(200006)25:3;1-H;FT285
Google Scholar
Seifert, J. (2003). The Right to Life and the Fourfold Root of Human Dignity. In E. Sgreccia, de Dios Vial Correa, Juan (Ed.), The Nature and Dignity of the Human Person as the Foundation of the Right to Life. The Challenges of the Contemporary Cultural Context (p. 194215).
Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1987). Animal liberation or animal rights? The Monist, 70(1), 3–14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19877018
Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1996). Rethinking life and death: the collapse of our traditional ethics. St. Martin’s Griffin.
Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2009). Speciesism and moral status. Metaphilosophy, 40(3/4), 567581.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01608.x
Google Scholar
Spaemann, R. (2006). Persons: The Difference Between Someone and Something. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Thornton, T. (2006). Judgement and the role of the metaphysics of values in medical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(6), 365–370.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.012518
Google Scholar
Trotter, G. (2020). The Authority of the Common Morality. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 45(4-5), 427–440.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa015
Google Scholar
Warren, M. A. (1973). On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion. The Monist, 57(1), 43–61.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197357133
Google Scholar
Authors
Szczepan Kaleciakszczepankaleciak@pm.me
The Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow, Poland Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-5909
Rev. Szczepan Kaleciak — holder of a master's degree and a licentiate in theology from the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Kraków; medical doctor. Prior to entering the seminary, he collaborated with the Institute of Bioethics at the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Kraków and with the Bioethics Counseling Center in Kraków. His research interests include bioethics and medical ethics, with particular attention to their contemporary currents.
Statistics
Abstract views: 1PDF downloads: 1
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Szczepan Kaleciak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
