Generation Alpha in the Digital Age. Anthropological Shifts and a Contextual Pastoral Response
Michał Wilkosz
michal.wilkosz@gmail.comPolish Catholic Mission in Germany, Germany (Germany)
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3069-9088
Patryk Piotr Zając
University of Vienna, Austria (Austria)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8764-8253
Abstract
The article offers a theological interpretation of the anthropological and spiritual challenges associated with Generation Alpha, a cohort formed in a fully digitized, technologically saturated environment. It argues that the digital transformation of cognitive and relational patterns is not merely a sociocultural phenomenon but also a theological matter, insofar as it shapes the conditions under which truth, authority, and communion are received and embodied. The analysis critically engages with posthumanist and transhumanist proposals, identifying their normative limitations from the perspective of a Christian anthropology grounded in the human person's orientation toward truth and relationality. Selected phenomena associated with contemporary digital culture – such as nomophobia, cyberbullying, digital narcissism, the Lake Wobegon effect, cyberautomatism, and the incel subculture – are interpreted here as symptoms of existential fragility rather than as indicators of anthropological advancement. In response, the article outlines context-sensitive forms of pastoral practice, including small formation groups, religious tourism, individual spiritual accompaniment, and international retreat centres. These practices are presented not as innovations detached from tradition, but as renewed actualisations of ecclesial care under transformed epistemic conditions. The study contributes to practical theology by clarifying the anthropological and ecclesial implications of digital culture for youth ministry.Keywords:
Generation Alpha, Theological Anthropology, Digital Culture, Practical Theology, Pastoral Formation, Spiritual Accompaniment, Authority and TruthReferences
Blittersdorf, M. (2014). Geistliche Begleitung in Gruppen: Ein Beitrag zum Neuwerden der Kirche. Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Campbell, H. A. (2013). Digital religion: Understanding religious practice in new media worlds. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Cherry, C. E. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25(5), 975–979. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229
Google Scholar
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Duke University Press.
Google Scholar
Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490507974
Google Scholar
Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., & Sarris, J. (2019). The online brain: How the Internet may be changing our cognition. World Psychiatry, 18(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20617
Google Scholar
Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. J. Haraway, Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). Free Association Books.
Google Scholar
Haus Concordia. (2025). Haus Concordia – A place of encounter in Germany. Retrieved February 14, 2026, from https://www.haus-concordia.com/web/de/home-2
Google Scholar
Keles, B., McCrae, N., & Grealish, A. (2020). A systematic review: The influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1590851
Google Scholar
Kubera, G. (2024, November 30). Sztuczna inteligencja nie zwalnia z myślenia. Młodzi używają jej coraz częściej – nierzadko w niewłaściwy sposób. Business Insider Polska. Retrieved February 14, 2026, from https://businessinsider.com.pl/technologie/nowe-technologie/sztuczna-inteligencja-nie-zwalnia-z-myslenia-mlodzi-uzywaja-jej-coraz-czesciej/5sxzrbv
Google Scholar
Malabou, C. (2009). What should we do with our brain? Fordham University Press.
Google Scholar
More, M. (2013). The philosophy of transhumanism. In M. More & N. Vita-More (Eds.), The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future (pp. 3–17). Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Neurath, O. (1973). Anti-Spengler. In O. Neurath, Empiricism and sociology (Vol. 1, p. 199). D. Reidel.
Google Scholar
NewPastoral.net. (2025). Jak to działa. Retrieved February 14, 2026, from https://newpastoral.net/jak-to-dziala
Google Scholar
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0903620106
Google Scholar
Orben, A., & Przybylski, A. K. (2019). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1
Google Scholar
Ortony, A. (Ed.). (1993). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Osmer, R. R. (2008). Practical theology: An introduction. Eerdmans.
Google Scholar
Ostrowski, M. (2002). Wallfahrten oder religiöser Tourismus. In Il Santuario, spazio per un’accoglienza fraterna e universale. Atti del 3° Congresso Europeo sui Santuari e i Pellegrinaggi, Montserrat, 4–7 marzo 2002 (pp. 41–51).
Google Scholar
Ostrowski, M. (2005). Pilgern oder religiöser Tourismus. Turyzm, 15(1–2), 41–44.
Google Scholar
Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
Google Scholar
Pasteels, I., & Bastaits, K. (2020). Loneliness in children adapting to dual family life. In M. Kreyenfeld & H. Trappe (Eds.), Parental life courses after separation and divorce in Europe (Life Course Research and Social Policies, Vol. 12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44575-1_10
Google Scholar
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2012). Cyberbullying: An update and synthesis of the research. In J. W. Patchin & S. Hinduja (Eds.), Cyberbullying prevention and response: Expert perspectives (pp. 61–75). Routledge.
Google Scholar
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Google Scholar
Ra, C. K., Cho, J., Stone, M. D., De La Cerda, J., Goldenson, N. I., Moroney, E., Tung, I., Lee, S. S., & Leventhal, A. M. (2018). Association of digital media use with subsequent symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder among adolescents. JAMA, 320(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.8931
Google Scholar
Rae, G. (2014). The philosophical roots of Donna Haraway’s cyborg imagery: Descartes and Heidegger through Latour, Derrida, and Agamben. Human Studies, 37, 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9327-z
Google Scholar
Rodríguez-García, A.-M., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., & López Belmonte, J. (2020). Nomophobia: An individual’s growing fear of being without a smartphone – A systematic literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), Article 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020580
Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (2012). Unfamiliar noises: Hesse and Davidson on metaphor. In Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 162–172). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Rüsen, J. (2013). Classical Humanism–a Historical Survey. In: J. Rüsen (ed.), Approaching Humankind: Towards an Intercultural Humanism (p. 161-184). Goettingen: V&R unipress, Taipei: National Taiwan University Press.
Google Scholar
Stothart, C., Mitchum, A., & Yehnert, C. (2015). The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification” jest indeksowany jako Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(4), 893–897, DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000100.
Google Scholar
Striet, M. (2018). Ernstfall Freiheit: Arbeiten an der Schleifung der Bastionen. Herder.
Google Scholar
Sugiura, L. (2021). The incel rebellion: The rise of the manosphere and the virtual war against women. Emerald Publishing.
Google Scholar
Szpunar, M. (2016). Kultura cyfrowego narcyzmu. Wydawnictwa AGH.
Google Scholar
Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2012). Transhumanism as a secularist faith. Zygon, 47(4), 710–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.2012.01288.x
Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood (and what this means for the rest of us). Atria Books.
Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M. (2023). Generations: The real differences between Gen Z, millennials, Gen X, boomers, and silents—and what they mean for America’s future. Atria Books.
Google Scholar
Uncapher, M. R., & Wagner, A. D. (2018). Minds and brains of media multitaskers: Current findings and future directions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(40), 9889–9896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611612115
Google Scholar
Wendland, A. J., Babaee, M., & Fried, G. (Eds.). (2019). Heidegger on technology. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462
Google Scholar
Williams, T. (2013). Plasticity, in Retrospect: Changing the Future of the Humanities. Diacritics 41(1), 6-25. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dia.2013.0003.
Google Scholar
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1(3), 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.1998.1.237
Google Scholar
Ziatdinov, R., & Cilliers, J. (2021). Generation Alpha: Understanding the next cohort of university students. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(3), 783–789. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2021.3.783
Google Scholar
Authors
Michał Wilkoszmichal.wilkosz@gmail.com
Polish Catholic Mission in Germany, Germany Germany
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3069-9088
Michał Wilkosz – pastoral theologian, doctor of theology and Master of German linguistics; educated at the Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow and the University of Freiburg (Dr. theol.), with a Master’s degree from the University of Silesia in Katowice; completed additional studies in pedagogy, psychology, leadership, and management at the Warsaw School of Economics; his research focuses on pastoral psychology, youth religiosity, and transformations of religious life in migration and diaspora contexts; since 2017 associated with the Polish Catholic Mission in Germany, rector since 2021; author of academic and pastoral publications; presbyter of the Archdiocese of Krakow.
Authors
Patryk Piotr ZającUniversity of Vienna, Austria Austria
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8764-8253
Patryk Piotr Zając – philosopher specializing in epistemology, political epistemology, and political theology, with a focus on normativity, epistemic authority, neopragmatism (especially Richard Rorty), and the relationship between religion and democracy in post-communist contexts; currently conducting research at the University of Vienna on populism and Catholicism; co-editor of Threats to Democracy: Nationalism, Populism, Extremism and Christianity’s Response to Them (Unum Press, 2025) and editor of a forthcoming volume with Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht; participant and co-organizer of international research projects (including those led by Tomáš Halík) and academic events; member of the American Philosophical Association, the Gesellschaft für Analytische Philosophie, and The Richard Rorty Society.
Statistics
Abstract views: 0PDF downloads: 1
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Michał Wilkosz, Patryk Piotr Zając

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
