The Drama of Hunting
Mátyás Szalay
Instituto de Filosofía Edith Stein, Granada, Spain (Hiszpania)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-1877
Abstrakt
In this short essay I demonstrate that the contemporary discussion on animal rights has some problematic presuppositions concerning the role of philosophy. I argue that what is necessary is not so much to resolve the alleged cultural dispute than to re-learn how to approach it contemplatively. A certain type of hunting can offer a highly dramatic and personally transformative encounter with the animal world through which we can consider our participatory relationship with nature. Thus, after a short methodological introduction, I identify the type of hunting that may allow for such an experience. After the dramatic aspect of hunting is described and analyzed, I explain how the encounter with the quarry illuminates man’s paradoxical place in nature and its subordination to humanity. I finish by phenomenologically describing what the gaze of the hunted animal communicates and how witnessing it restores the contemplative context in which an authentic human response might be given to nature.
Słowa kluczowe:
polowanie, spotkanie, dramat, etyka zwierząt, Ortega y GassetBibliografia
Armstrong, P. (2011). “The gaze of animals” in Theorizing Animals: Re-thinking Humanimal Relations, eds. N. Taylor, T. Signal,pp.175–200. Leiden.
Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1789). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00077240
Google Scholar
Berry, W. (2018). The Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays of Wendell Berry, ed. N. Wirzba. Berkeley.
Google Scholar
Blondel, M. (1906). „Le point de départ de la recherche philosophique” in Anneles de Philosophie chrétienne 151, pp. 337–60.
Google Scholar
DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. New York.
Google Scholar
Douglas, H. „Hunt” Online EtymologyDictionary, retrieved from https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=hunt. “Fair Chase Statement,” Boone and Crockett Club, retrieved from https://www.boone-crockett.org/fair-chase-statement?area=huntingEthics.
Google Scholar
Gunther, K. (2019). „Hunting to Eat is not a Novel Idea. It is the Original Idea,” Eater.com, 21 November, retrieved from https://www.eater.com/2019/11/21/20947318/hunting-season-deer-game-meat-cooking.
Google Scholar
Hamilton, E.; Huntington, C.; Cooper, L. (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1c84fb0
Google Scholar
Hegedus, C. (Director, producer); Pennebaker P. A. (Director) (2016). Unlocking the Cage [Documentary], United States: Pennebaker Hegedus Films.von
Google Scholar
Hildebrand, D. (1976). „What is philosophy?” trans. F. Wenisch, in Gesammelte Werke I. Regensburg/Stuttgart.
Google Scholar
„Hunting,” In Defense of Animals, retrieved from https://www.idausa.org/campaign/wild-animals-and-habitats/hunting/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwqfz6BRD8ARIsAIXQCf1BYvFlCBonJcHq_cOHUJXfBCoM4xFGS2ngf_MLSgOMbYTpndPfOPgaAn5fEALw_wcB.
Google Scholar
„In Defense of Animals: Rescue. Respect. Revolution. Together,” In Defense of Animals, retrieved from https://www.idausa.org/about-ida/.
Google Scholar
Internet Hunting Fact Sheet, Humane Society of the United States, retrieved from https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/internet-hunting-fact-sheet#.UzjiW61dW9Y.
Google Scholar
Jagiełło, J. (2020). Józef Tischner. Ignatianum University Press, Krakow.
Google Scholar
Lobato Casado, A. (1997). Dignidad y aventura humana. Salamanca.de Lubac, H. (1965). Le mystère du surnatural. Paris.
Google Scholar
Mester, B. (2014). “Az ember és állat közötti fal döntögetése” in Falak és választóvonalak a történelemben, pp. 299-310. Nyíregyháza. della Mirandola, P. (2012). Oration on the Dignity of Man: A New Translation anCommentary, eds. F. Borghesi, M. Papio, M. Riva. Cambridge.
Google Scholar
Oggins, R. S. (2004). The Kings and Their Hawks: Falconry in Medieval England. New Haven.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300100587.001.0001
Google Scholar
Ortega y Gasset, J. (2007). Meditations on Hunting. Belgrade.
Google Scholar
Posewitz, J. (1994). Beyond Fair Chase. Helena.
Google Scholar
Regan, T.(1985). “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. P. Singer, pp. 13-26. New York.
Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1967). The Symbolism of Evil, trans. E. Buchanan. Boston.
Google Scholar
Rudolph, C. (1990). The “Things of Greater Importance”: Bernard of Clairvaux’s “Apologia” and the Medieval Attitude Toward Art. Philadelphia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512806410
Google Scholar
Seifert, J. (2009). Discours Des Méthodes: The Methods of Philosophy and Realist Phenomenology. Berlin/Boston.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110329179
Google Scholar
Singer, P. (2017). “All animals are equal,” in Animal Rights, ed. C. Palmer, pp. 3-16. London 2017.
Google Scholar
Takáçová D. et al. (2013). “Animal as subject of law,” in Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja 135 (January), pp. 57–59.
Google Scholar
Tischner, J. (1989). Das menschliche Drama. Phaenomenologische Studien zur Philosophie des Dramas, trans. S. Dzida. Wilhem Fink Verlag, München.
Google Scholar
Tóth I. J.; Hérány, F. (2013). „A személy környezetetikai vonatkozásai,” in A személy bioetikai kontextusa, eds. K. Sándor, R. Erzsébet, pp. 239-258. Debrecen.
Google Scholar
White, L. (1967). “The historical roots of our ecologic crisis,” in Science 155 n. 3767, pp. 1203–7.
Google Scholar
Wood, F. (1997). The Delights and Dilemmas of Hunting: The Hunting versus Anti-Hunting Debate. Lanham.
Google Scholar
Autorzy
Mátyás SzalayInstituto de Filosofía Edith Stein, Granada, Spain Hiszpania
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-1877
Dr Mátyás Szalay – dyrektor Instytutu Filozofii im. Edyty Stein w Grenadzie (Hiszpania). Uzyskał doktorat z filozofii na the International Academy of Philosophy in Liechtenstein.
Statystyki
Abstract views: 321PDF downloads: 90
Licencja
Czasopismo jest bezpłatne i udostępniane na zasadach otwartego dostępu (w formacie pdf na stronie internetowej). Od autorów artykułów nie są pobierane żadne opłaty. „Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne” ukazują się na licencji według standardów Creative Commons: CC BY-ND 4.0 (Uznanie autorstwa - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe) i nie prowadzą skonkretyzowanej polityki dotyczącej danych badawczych. Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie.