The Drama of Hunting


Abstrakt

In this short essay I demonstrate that the contemporary discussion on animal rights has some problematic presuppositions concerning the role of philosophy. I argue that what is necessary is not so much to resolve the alleged cultural dispute than to re-learn how to approach it contemplatively. A certain type of hunting can offer a highly dramatic and personally transformative encounter with the animal world through which we can consider our participatory relationship with nature. Thus, after a short methodological introduction, I identify the type of hunting that may allow for such an experience. After the dramatic aspect of hunting is described and analyzed, I explain how the encounter with the quarry illuminates man’s paradoxical place in nature and its subordination to humanity. I finish by phenomenologically describing what the gaze of the hunted animal communicates and how witnessing it restores the contemplative context in which an authentic human response might be given to nature.


Armstrong, P. (2011). “The gaze of animals” in Theorizing Animals: Re-thinking Humanimal Relations, eds. N. Taylor, T. Signal,pp.175–200. Leiden.

Bentham, J. (1789). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London.

Berry, W. (2018). The Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays of Wendell Berry, ed. N. Wirzba. Berkeley.

Blondel, M. (1906). „Le point de départ de la recherche philosophique” in Anneles de Philosophie chrétienne 151, pp. 337–60.

DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. New York.

Douglas, H. „Hunt” Online EtymologyDictionary, retrieved from https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=hunt. “Fair Chase Statement,” Boone and Crockett Club, retrieved from https://www.boone-crockett.org/fair-chase-statement?area=huntingEthics.

Gunther, K. (2019). „Hunting to Eat is not a Novel Idea. It is the Original Idea,” Eater.com, 21 November, retrieved from https://www.eater.com/2019/11/21/20947318/hunting-season-deer-game-meat-cooking.

Hamilton, E.; Huntington, C.; Cooper, L. (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton.

Hegedus, C. (Director, producer); Pennebaker P. A. (Director) (2016). Unlocking the Cage [Documentary], United States: Pennebaker Hegedus Films.von

Hildebrand, D. (1976). „What is philosophy?” trans. F. Wenisch, in Gesammelte Werke I. Regensburg/Stuttgart.

„Hunting,” In Defense of Animals, retrieved from https://www.idausa.org/campaign/wild-animals-and-habitats/hunting/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwqfz6BRD8ARIsAIXQCf1BYvFlCBonJcHq_cOHUJXfBCoM4xFGS2ngf_MLSgOMbYTpndPfOPgaAn5fEALw_wcB.

„In Defense of Animals: Rescue. Respect. Revolution. Together,” In Defense of Animals, retrieved from https://www.idausa.org/about-ida/.

Internet Hunting Fact Sheet, Humane Society of the United States, retrieved from https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/internet-hunting-fact-sheet#.UzjiW61dW9Y.

Jagiełło, J. (2020). Józef Tischner. Ignatianum University Press, Krakow.

Lobato Casado, A. (1997). Dignidad y aventura humana. Salamanca.de Lubac, H. (1965). Le mystère du surnatural. Paris.

Mester, B. (2014). “Az ember és állat közötti fal döntögetése” in Falak és választóvonalak a történelemben, pp. 299-310. Nyíregyháza. della Mirandola, P. (2012). Oration on the Dignity of Man: A New Translation anCommentary, eds. F. Borghesi, M. Papio, M. Riva. Cambridge.

Oggins, R. S. (2004). The Kings and Their Hawks: Falconry in Medieval England. New Haven.

Ortega y Gasset, J. (2007). Meditations on Hunting. Belgrade.

Posewitz, J. (1994). Beyond Fair Chase. Helena.

Regan, T.(1985). “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. P. Singer, pp. 13-26. New York.

Ricoeur, P. (1967). The Symbolism of Evil, trans. E. Buchanan. Boston.

Rudolph, C. (1990). The “Things of Greater Importance”: Bernard of Clairvaux’s “Apologia” and the Medieval Attitude Toward Art. Philadelphia.

Seifert, J. (2009). Discours Des Méthodes: The Methods of Philosophy and Realist Phenomenology. Berlin/Boston.

Singer, P. (2017). “All animals are equal,” in Animal Rights, ed. C. Palmer, pp. 3-16. London 2017.

Takáçová D. et al. (2013). “Animal as subject of law,” in Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja 135 (January), pp. 57–59.

Tischner, J. (1989). Das menschliche Drama. Phaenomenologische Studien zur Philosophie des Dramas, trans. S. Dzida. Wilhem Fink Verlag, München.

Tóth I. J.; Hérány, F. (2013). „A személy környezetetikai vonatkozásai,” in A személy bioetikai kontextusa, eds. K. Sándor, R. Erzsébet, pp. 239-258. Debrecen.

White, L. (1967). “The historical roots of our ecologic crisis,” in Science 155 n. 3767, pp. 1203–7.

Wood, F. (1997). The Delights and Dilemmas of Hunting: The Hunting versus Anti-Hunting Debate. Lanham.


Opublikowane : 2020-12-05


Szalay, M. (2020). The Drama of Hunting . Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne, 33(2), 166-182. https://doi.org/10.30439/WST.2020.2.9

Mátyás Szalay 
Instituto de Filosofía Edith Stein, Granada, Spain  Hiszpania
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-1877

Dr Mátyás Szalay – dyrektor Instytutu Filozofii im. Edyty Stein w Grenadzie (Hiszpania). Uzyskał doktorat z filozofii na the International Academy of Philosophy in Liechtenstein.






Creative Commons License

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Czasopismo jest bezpłatne i udostępniane na zasadach otwartego dostępu (w formacie pdf na stronie internetowej). Od autorów artykułów nie są pobierane żadne opłaty. „Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne” ukazują się na licencji według standardów Creative Commons: CC BY-ND 4.0 (Uznanie autorstwa - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe) i nie prowadzą skonkretyzowanej polityki dotyczącej danych badawczych. Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie.