The Drama of Hunting

Mátyás Szalay


Instituto de Filosofía Edith Stein, Granada, Spain (Hiszpania)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-1877

Abstrakt

In this short essay I demonstrate that the contemporary discussion on animal rights has some problematic presuppositions concerning the role of philosophy. I argue that what is necessary is not so much to resolve the alleged cultural dispute than to re-learn how to approach it contemplatively. A certain type of hunting can offer a highly dramatic and personally transformative encounter with the animal world through which we can consider our participatory relationship with nature. Thus, after a short methodological introduction, I identify the type of hunting that may allow for such an experience. After the dramatic aspect of hunting is described and analyzed, I explain how the encounter with the quarry illuminates man’s paradoxical place in nature and its subordination to humanity. I finish by phenomenologically describing what the gaze of the hunted animal communicates and how witnessing it restores the contemplative context in which an authentic human response might be given to nature.


Słowa kluczowe:

polowanie, spotkanie, dramat, etyka zwierząt, Ortega y Gasset

Armstrong, P. (2011). “The gaze of animals” in Theorizing Animals: Re-thinking Humanimal Relations, eds. N. Taylor, T. Signal,pp.175–200. Leiden.
  Google Scholar

Bentham, J. (1789). Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00077240   Google Scholar

Berry, W. (2018). The Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays of Wendell Berry, ed. N. Wirzba. Berkeley.
  Google Scholar

Blondel, M. (1906). „Le point de départ de la recherche philosophique” in Anneles de Philosophie chrétienne 151, pp. 337–60.
  Google Scholar

DeMello, M. (2012). Animals and Society: An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies. New York.
  Google Scholar

Douglas, H. „Hunt” Online EtymologyDictionary, retrieved from https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=hunt. “Fair Chase Statement,” Boone and Crockett Club, retrieved from https://www.boone-crockett.org/fair-chase-statement?area=huntingEthics.
  Google Scholar

Gunther, K. (2019). „Hunting to Eat is not a Novel Idea. It is the Original Idea,” Eater.com, 21 November, retrieved from https://www.eater.com/2019/11/21/20947318/hunting-season-deer-game-meat-cooking.
  Google Scholar

Hamilton, E.; Huntington, C.; Cooper, L. (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1c84fb0   Google Scholar

Hegedus, C. (Director, producer); Pennebaker P. A. (Director) (2016). Unlocking the Cage [Documentary], United States: Pennebaker Hegedus Films.von
  Google Scholar

Hildebrand, D. (1976). „What is philosophy?” trans. F. Wenisch, in Gesammelte Werke I. Regensburg/Stuttgart.
  Google Scholar

„Hunting,” In Defense of Animals, retrieved from https://www.idausa.org/campaign/wild-animals-and-habitats/hunting/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwqfz6BRD8ARIsAIXQCf1BYvFlCBonJcHq_cOHUJXfBCoM4xFGS2ngf_MLSgOMbYTpndPfOPgaAn5fEALw_wcB.
  Google Scholar

„In Defense of Animals: Rescue. Respect. Revolution. Together,” In Defense of Animals, retrieved from https://www.idausa.org/about-ida/.
  Google Scholar

Internet Hunting Fact Sheet, Humane Society of the United States, retrieved from https://www.humanesociety.org/resources/internet-hunting-fact-sheet#.UzjiW61dW9Y.
  Google Scholar

Jagiełło, J. (2020). Józef Tischner. Ignatianum University Press, Krakow.
  Google Scholar

Lobato Casado, A. (1997). Dignidad y aventura humana. Salamanca.de Lubac, H. (1965). Le mystère du surnatural. Paris.
  Google Scholar

Mester, B. (2014). “Az ember és állat közötti fal döntögetése” in Falak és választóvonalak a történelemben, pp. 299-310. Nyíregyháza. della Mirandola, P. (2012). Oration on the Dignity of Man: A New Translation anCommentary, eds. F. Borghesi, M. Papio, M. Riva. Cambridge.
  Google Scholar

Oggins, R. S. (2004). The Kings and Their Hawks: Falconry in Medieval England. New Haven.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300100587.001.0001   Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset, J. (2007). Meditations on Hunting. Belgrade.
  Google Scholar

Posewitz, J. (1994). Beyond Fair Chase. Helena.
  Google Scholar

Regan, T.(1985). “The Case for Animal Rights,” in In Defense of Animals, ed. P. Singer, pp. 13-26. New York.
  Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1967). The Symbolism of Evil, trans. E. Buchanan. Boston.
  Google Scholar

Rudolph, C. (1990). The “Things of Greater Importance”: Bernard of Clairvaux’s “Apologia” and the Medieval Attitude Toward Art. Philadelphia.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9781512806410   Google Scholar

Seifert, J. (2009). Discours Des Méthodes: The Methods of Philosophy and Realist Phenomenology. Berlin/Boston.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110329179   Google Scholar

Singer, P. (2017). “All animals are equal,” in Animal Rights, ed. C. Palmer, pp. 3-16. London 2017.
  Google Scholar

Takáçová D. et al. (2013). “Animal as subject of law,” in Magyar Állatorvosok Lapja 135 (January), pp. 57–59.
  Google Scholar

Tischner, J. (1989). Das menschliche Drama. Phaenomenologische Studien zur Philosophie des Dramas, trans. S. Dzida. Wilhem Fink Verlag, München.
  Google Scholar

Tóth I. J.; Hérány, F. (2013). „A személy környezetetikai vonatkozásai,” in A személy bioetikai kontextusa, eds. K. Sándor, R. Erzsébet, pp. 239-258. Debrecen.
  Google Scholar

White, L. (1967). “The historical roots of our ecologic crisis,” in Science 155 n. 3767, pp. 1203–7.
  Google Scholar

Wood, F. (1997). The Delights and Dilemmas of Hunting: The Hunting versus Anti-Hunting Debate. Lanham.
  Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2020-12-05

Cited By / Share

Szalay, M. . (2020). The Drama of Hunting . Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne, 33(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.30439/WST.2020.2.9

Autorzy

Mátyás Szalay 

Instituto de Filosofía Edith Stein, Granada, Spain Hiszpania
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5557-1877

Dr Mátyás Szalay – dyrektor Instytutu Filozofii im. Edyty Stein w Grenadzie (Hiszpania). Uzyskał doktorat z filozofii na the International Academy of Philosophy in Liechtenstein.



Statystyki

Abstract views: 255
PDF downloads: 83


Licencja

Czasopismo jest bezpłatne i udostępniane na zasadach otwartego dostępu (w formacie pdf na stronie internetowej). Od autorów artykułów nie są pobierane żadne opłaty. „Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne” ukazują się na licencji według standardów Creative Commons: CC BY-ND 4.0 (Uznanie autorstwa - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe) i nie prowadzą skonkretyzowanej polityki dotyczącej danych badawczych. Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie.