So what are we really talking about? A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of Keywords and Collocations in the »Theologische Quartalsschrift«

Matthias Werner


Universität Augsburg, Germany (Germany)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-7420

Abstract

This article presents a corpus linguistic analysis of the »Theologische Quartalsschrift«, a German journal on theology. The research identifies topics discussed in Catholic Theology by analyzing 81 volumes from 1925 to 2006 (excluding 1945). By filtering the corpus and focusing on nouns, frequent terms are identified, offering insights into central subjects.
The study enhances understanding of German Catholic Theology, providing transparency and objective insights in order to provide a clear explanation of Catholic Theology to outsiders, even in secularized contexts.
To insiders, this approach enables the discovery of blind spots and fosters discourse in scientific theology by making discussions explicit.
Overall, it demonstrates the usefulness of corpus linguistics in studying theological discourse and sheds light on the topics theologians engage with. The analysis contributes to a more informed and constructive dialogue within the field.


Keywords:

Catholic Theology, corpus linguistics, keywords, collocations, blind spots, theological discourse

Altmeyer, S. (2015). Exploring the unknown: the language use of German RE-students writing texts about God. British journal of religious education 37(1), 20–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2013.830962
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2013.830962   Google Scholar

Altmeyer, S. (2019). Art. Korpusanalyse. Wissenschaftlich-Religionspädagogisches Lexikon im Internet (WiReLex), Febr. 2019. Accessed at: https://www.bibelwissenschaft.de/stichwort/200609/ (2023, 05, 16).
  Google Scholar

Bubenhofer, N. (2009). Sprachgebrauchsmuster. Korpuslinguistik als Methode der Diskurs- und Kulturanalyse (=Sprache und Wissen 4), Berlin und Boston: De Gruyter.
  Google Scholar

Heilmann, J. (2022). Antike Ethik aus der Distanz: Computationelle Methoden zur Erforschung der Ethik im Neuen Testament und im antiken Christentum? Journal of ethics in Antiquity and Christianity, 2022(4), 12–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25784/jeac.v4i0.1010
  Google Scholar

Muhammad, Y. S. (2022). Islam-Stereotype im deutschsprachigen Salafismusdiskurs: eine korpuslinguistische Untersuchung anhand ausgewählter Korpora, Göttingen: Erich Schmidt.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37307/b.978-3-503-20542-4   Google Scholar

Scherer, C. (22014). Korpuslinguistik (=Kurze Einführungen in die germanistische Linguistik 2), Heidelberg: Winter.
  Google Scholar

Warnke, I. & Wilk, N. (2022). Religion im kolonialen Archiv. Berliner theologische Zeitschrift 39(1), 309–335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bthz-2022-0016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/bthz-2022-0016   Google Scholar

Download


Published
2023-07-28

Cited by

Werner, M. (2023). So what are we really talking about? A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of Keywords and Collocations in the »Theologische Quartalsschrift«. Warsaw Theological Studies, 36(1), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.30439/WST.2023.1.12

Authors

Matthias Werner 

Universität Augsburg, Germany Germany
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-7420

Matthias Werner - assistant professor (Akademischer Rat a.Z.) at the Chair of Religious Education, the Faculty of Catholic Theology, the University of Augsburg. Member of the Board of Directors of the Center for Teacher Education and Interdisciplinary Educational Research. Address: Katholisch-Theologische Fakultät, Universität Augsburg, Universitätsstraße 10, 86159 Augsburg (Germany).



Statistics

Abstract views: 64
PDF downloads: 47


License

Copyright (c) 2023 Warsaw Theological Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The journal is available free-of-charge and according to the Open Access regulations (as a PDF file on the website). The authors do not incur any costs related to publication. The journal is published in accordance with the Creative Commons license standard:  CC BY-ND 4.0 (Attribution – NoDerivatives 4.0 International)  and does not follow a concrete policy of conducting research. By submitting the article, the author gives the consent to such a form of sharing the text. The authors of the published articles retain their copyrights.