Mysticism and Early Analytic Philosophy
Abstract
Early analytic philosophy is known for its logical rigor that seems to leave no place for non-rational sources of knowledge such as mystical experiences. The following paper shows on the example of Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein that despite of this early analytic philosophy was interested in mysticism and it also shows the roots of this interest. For Russell an application of logical methods to solving philosophical puzzled was an expression of a more fundamental striving – to know the world as it is, sub specie aeternitatis – which is mystical in nature. In turn early Wittgenstein’s philosophy sets the limits of meaningful propositions and provides the distinction between what can be said and what can only be shown and what manifests itself in the world. The latter belongs to the realm of the mystical.
Keywords:
Ludwig Wittgenstein, Bertrand Russell, early analytic philosophy, philosophical mysticism, logical atomismReferences
Cook, J. W. (1994). Wittgenstein’s Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895364
Google Scholar
Glock, H-J. (1996). A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631185376.1996.00006.x
Google Scholar
Englemann, P. (1967). Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein with a Memoir. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Hacker, P. (1996). Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge: Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.1996.tb00162.x
Google Scholar
Idziak-Smoczyńska, U. (2018). Wittgenstein in Polish Galicia. w: R. Schweitzer (red.), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Die Tractatus Odyssee (61-72). Wien: Wittgenstein Innitiative.
Google Scholar
Lampert, T. (2000). Wittgenstein’s Physikalismus. Die Sinnesdatenanalyse des «Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus» in ihrem historischen Kontext. Padeborn: Mentis.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783969752012
Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. (1986). Nothing Is Hidden. Wittgenstein’s Criticism of his Early Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. (1994). Wittgenstein: a Religious Point of View? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203275221
Google Scholar
McGuinness (2002). Approaches to Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203404928
Google Scholar
Monk, R. (1991). Ludwig Wittgenstein. The Duty of Genius. London: Random House.
Google Scholar
Moser, P. (2013). The Severity of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139151764
Google Scholar
Nathanson, S. (1985). Russell’s Scientific Mysticism. Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 1 (5), 14-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v5i1.1646
Google Scholar
Pears, D. F. (1987). The False Prison. Vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198247702.001.0001
Google Scholar
Proops, I. (2011). Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Pobrano z: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/wittgenstein-atomism/, Dnia (2021, 6, 2).
Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1901/1948). Mathematics and the Metaphysicians. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (74-96). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1902/1948). Free Man’s Worship. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (46-57). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1907/1948). The Study of Mathematics. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (58-73). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1914a/1948). Scientific Method in Philosophy. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (95-124). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1914b/1948). Mysticism and Logic. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (1-32). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1915/1948). The Ultimate Constituents of Matter. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (125-144). London: George Allen & Unwin.
Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1965). A Lecture on Ethics. The Philosophical Review 1 (74), 3-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2183526
Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Notebooks 1914-1916. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2002). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Translated by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. London-New York: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203010341
Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and J. Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Authors
Marek DobrzenieckiAkademia Katolicka w Warszawie Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1992-3222
Ks. Marek Dobrzeniecki — dr filozofii, wykładowca na Akademii Katolickiej w Warszawie, autor książki Ukrytość i Wcielenie. Teistyczna odpowiedź na argument Johna L. Schellenberga za nieistnieniem Boga (Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2020), redaktor antologii: Teologia między Wschodem a Zachodem (Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2019). Specjalizuje się w analitycznej filozofii religii.
Statistics
Abstract views: 271PDF downloads: 87