Mysticism and Early Analytic Philosophy

Marek Dobrzeniecki


Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie (Polska)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1992-3222

Abstrakt

Early analytic philosophy is known for its logical rigor that seems to leave no place for non-rational sources of knowledge such as mystical experiences. The following paper shows on the example of Bertrand Russell and Ludwig Wittgenstein that despite of this early analytic philosophy was interested in mysticism and it also shows the roots of this interest. For Russell an application of logical methods to solving philosophical puzzled was an expression of a more fundamental striving – to know the world as it is, sub specie aeternitatis – which is mystical in nature. In turn early Wittgenstein’s philosophy sets the limits of meaningful propositions and provides the distinction between what can be said and what can only be shown and what manifests itself in the world. The latter belongs to the realm of the mystical.


Słowa kluczowe:

Ludwig Wittgenstein, Bertrand Russell, wczesna filozofia analityczna, mistycyzm filozoficzny, atomizm logiczny

Cook, J. W. (1994). Wittgenstein’s Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895364   Google Scholar

Glock, H-J. (1996). A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631185376.1996.00006.x   Google Scholar

Englemann, P. (1967). Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein with a Memoir. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  Google Scholar

Hacker, P. (1996). Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy. Cambridge: Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9329.1996.tb00162.x   Google Scholar

Idziak-Smoczyńska, U. (2018). Wittgenstein in Polish Galicia. w: R. Schweitzer (red.), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Die Tractatus Odyssee (61-72). Wien: Wittgenstein Innitiative.
  Google Scholar

Lampert, T. (2000). Wittgenstein’s Physikalismus. Die Sinnesdatenanalyse des «Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus» in ihrem historischen Kontext. Padeborn: Mentis.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30965/9783969752012   Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. (1986). Nothing Is Hidden. Wittgenstein’s Criticism of his Early Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  Google Scholar

Malcolm, N. (1994). Wittgenstein: a Religious Point of View? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203275221   Google Scholar

McGuinness (2002). Approaches to Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203404928   Google Scholar

Monk, R. (1991). Ludwig Wittgenstein. The Duty of Genius. London: Random House.
  Google Scholar

Moser, P. (2013). The Severity of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139151764   Google Scholar

Nathanson, S. (1985). Russell’s Scientific Mysticism. Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 1 (5), 14-25.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/russell.v5i1.1646   Google Scholar

Pears, D. F. (1987). The False Prison. Vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198247702.001.0001   Google Scholar

Proops, I. (2011). Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Pobrano z: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/wittgenstein-atomism/, Dnia (2021, 6, 2).
  Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1901/1948). Mathematics and the Metaphysicians. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (74-96). London: George Allen & Unwin.
  Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1902/1948). Free Man’s Worship. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (46-57). London: George Allen & Unwin.
  Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1907/1948). The Study of Mathematics. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (58-73). London: George Allen & Unwin.
  Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1914a/1948). Scientific Method in Philosophy. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (95-124). London: George Allen & Unwin.
  Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1914b/1948). Mysticism and Logic. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (1-32). London: George Allen & Unwin.
  Google Scholar

Russell, B. (1915/1948). The Ultimate Constituents of Matter. w: B. Russell, Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays (125-144). London: George Allen & Unwin.
  Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1965). A Lecture on Ethics. The Philosophical Review 1 (74), 3-12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2183526   Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1979). Notebooks 1914-1916. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (2002). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Translated by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. London-New York: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203010341   Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and J. Schulte. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  Google Scholar


Opublikowane
2021-09-27

Cited By / Share

Dobrzeniecki, M. . (2021). Mysticism and Early Analytic Philosophy. Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne, 34(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.30439/WST.2021.1.7

Autorzy

Marek Dobrzeniecki 

Akademia Katolicka w Warszawie Polska
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1992-3222

Ks. Marek Dobrzeniecki — dr filozofii, wykładowca na Akademii Katolickiej w Warszawie, autor książki Ukrytość i Wcielenie. Teistyczna odpowiedź na argument Johna L. Schellenberga za nieistnieniem Boga (Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2020), redaktor antologii: Teologia między Wschodem a Zachodem (Wydawnictwo WAM, Kraków 2019). Specjalizuje się w analitycznej filozofii religii.

 



Statystyki

Abstract views: 278
PDF downloads: 90


Licencja

Czasopismo jest bezpłatne i udostępniane na zasadach otwartego dostępu (w formacie pdf na stronie internetowej). Od autorów artykułów nie są pobierane żadne opłaty. „Warszawskie Studia Teologiczne” ukazują się na licencji według standardów Creative Commons: CC BY-ND 4.0 (Uznanie autorstwa - Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe) i nie prowadzą skonkretyzowanej polityki dotyczącej danych badawczych. Autorzy zachowują prawa autorskie.